Reproductive Health

Subscribe to Reproductive Health via RSS

Since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision (which overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade decision), the healthcare industry has continued to grapple with renewed concerns over patient privacy and reproductive healthcare. Legislators and regulators have not been idle, establishing a patchwork of authorities which require careful navigation and consideration. It is worth noting that reproductive healthcare privacy is not a concern exclusive to women. Rather, such privacy concerns also apply to services traditionally received by men, such as testosterone replacement and male fertility treatments.Continue Reading The State of Reproductive Healthcare Privacy

Over two years into the post-Dobbs era, women’s health is taking center stage in the presidential election. In Dobbs v. Jackson, the Supreme Court overturned protections relating to abortion established in Roe v. Wade. Since then, approximately half of the states across the country have enacted or revived laws that ban or significantly restrict access to abortion. This case and the resulting cascade of legal disputes and legislative battles have created a highly dynamic and precarious legal landscape for women’s health. As a result, providers are left uncertain of their rights and obligations. Women in anti-abortion states face challenges obtaining reproductive care and, if pregnant, other medical treatments unrelated to reproductive care, while hospitals and clinics in nearby states without such restrictions are grappling with overwhelming patient loads. Continue Reading Women’s Health on the Ballot in November: What the Election Could Mean for Reproductive Care and Beyond