Federal Healthcare Legislation

Subscribe to Federal Healthcare Legislation via RSS

For years, the conversation around health insurer consolidation and vertical integration has simmered through antitrust inquiries, oversight hearings, and policy papers. The Patients Over Profit Act (the “POP Act”)[i], introduced in both chambers of Congress this fall, marks a decisive shift. Rather than regulating insurer-provider integration, the POP Act proposes to ban it outright.Continue Reading Patients Over Profit Act: A Federal Inflection Point on Insurer-Provider Integration and What Comes Next

Among the many sweeping changes to the Medicaid program included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”), Congress established new statutory caps on state-directed payments (“SDPs”) in Medicaid managed care. SDPs have long served as a critical mechanism for states pursuing value-based payment (“VBP”) reforms, addressing network adequacy, and advancing health equity for underserved populations. OBBBA imposes explicit Medicare-based caps on new SDPs, time-limited exceptions for certain SDPs that were approved or in development on or before July 4, 2025, and a phased transition to new payment caps beginning January 1, 2028, that will reshape state payment policy tools to drive VBP, narrow disparities, and close gaps in access.[1] State Medicaid agencies, healthcare providers, patient advocacy groups, and other stakeholders should prepare to weigh in as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) proposes regulations to implement these changes in the coming months.Continue Reading State-Directed Payments, Value-Based Care, and the “One Big Beautiful” Bill: A Comprehensive Analysis

On Thursday, May 22, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a budget reconciliation bill introduced by House Republicans, by a 215-214 vote. The bill extends key provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, currently set to expire at the end of 2025, and allocates additional funding for defense and other federal priorities. It also includes reductions in government spending and revised eligibility requirements for several federal aid programs.Continue Reading House-Passed Budget Bill – the One Big Beautiful Bill Act – Includes Major Changes to Medicaid

On May 15, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) released a proposed rule, entitled “Preserving Medicaid Funding for Vulnerable Populations – Closing a Health Care-Related Tax Loophole” to address a financing loophole that allows states to shift more Medicaid costs to the federal government than intended (the “Proposed Rule”). If finalized as proposed, states that received CMS-approved waivers for state healthcare-related taxes within the last year—including California, New York, Michigan, and Massachusetts—would be required to modify or eliminate those state taxes immediately or risk losing federal matching funds for expenditures paid using those tax revenues. Comments from stakeholders are due by July 14, 2025.Continue Reading Proposed Rule on Medicaid Tax Waivers: CMS Moves to Close a Loophole Shifting Costs to the Federal Government

On January 28, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14187 (the “EO”), which directed the federal government to take steps to ensure that the federal government does not “sponsor, promote, assist, or support” the “‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another,” including the provision of gender-affirming care to individuals under the age of nineteen. Specific provisions of the EO directed, among other things, that: (1) all federal agencies rescind or amend all policies relying on guidance issued by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health; (2) federal agencies that provide research or education grants to hospitals and medical schools take “appropriate steps” to ensure that institutions receiving federal research or education grants end gender-affirming care to individuals under the age of nineteen; (3) the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) take all appropriate regulatory and legal action to end gender-affirming care for individuals under the age of nineteen—such as through Medicare or Medicaid conditions of participation or conditions for coverage, clinical-abuse or inappropriate-use assessments relevant to State Medicaid programs; (4) the U.S. Attorney General to enforce an existing federal law against “genital mutilation” (18 U.S.C. § 116), and coordinate with state attorneys general to enforce state laws against gender-affirming care; and (5) the Director of the Office of Personnel Management include provisions in the Federal Employee Health Benefits and Postal Service Health Benefits programs call letter for the 2026 plan year specifying that eligible carriers exclude coverage for pediatric transgender surgeries or hormone treatments.Continue Reading Recent Legal and Regulatory Developments Involving Gender-Affirming Care

With only two weeks remaining in the year, Congress is considering a government funding deal (the “Further Continuing Appropriations and Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2025” or the “Bill”) that includes a welcome holiday gift for health care providers and patients – an expansive health care package that would extend certain telehealth flexibilities promulgated during the COVID-19 public health emergency (“PHE”) for an additional two years. The extended telehealth flexibilities are currently set to expire on December 31, 2024. This extension would generally allow providers to continue to serve Medicare patients via telehealth consistent with the current practices.Continue Reading Congress Extends Telehealth Flexibilities for Two More Years

The U.S. has long had a shortage of physicians in various practice areas. The shortage is even more pronounced in rural areas. International medical graduates (IMG’s) who come to the U.S. to complete a residency in a specialty area primarily come to the U.S. on J-1 visas. By statute, any physician who enters the U.S. on a J-1 must return home for 2 years before applying for H-1B status or permanent residency.Continue Reading Having Trouble Recruiting Physicians? The Conrad 30 Window is Opening Soon

Introduction

On December 29, 2022, President Biden signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (the “Act”). The Act provides for nearly $1.7 trillion in funding across a range of domestic…

Continue Reading Key Healthcare Provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023

The Jackson v. Dobbs decision catalyzed a shift in the legal landscape of reproductive rights in the United States. The decision held that there is no federal constitutional right to an abortion, leaving the ability to regulate access to abortion services to the states. In the wake of this ruling, there have been a number of legal developments that range from states implementing laws that prohibit or restrict access to reproductive care, to federal agencies taking action to protect patient privacy and preserve access to reproductive care. Below are some of the most recent developments* at the federal and state levels:Continue Reading An Update on the Federal and State E-Roe-sion or P-Roe-tection of Abortion Rights

On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392 (2022), holding that the United States Constitution provides no basis for a right to abortion. In its opinion, the Court further states that the right to abortion is not in the text of the Constitution, not a part of this nation’s fundamental history or concept of ordered liberty, that abortion restrictions are subject to rational basis review, and that the authority to regulate abortions lies with the 50 individual states. This decision, which is consistent with the draft opinion leaked in May, overrules both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which have served as precedent on abortion issues and rights for the past 50 years.Continue Reading Supreme Court Decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Overturns 50 Years of Precedent on Abortion Laws and Rights

In our November 9, 2021, blog post on the No Surprises Act (“NSA”), we discussed new consumer protections against surprise out-of-network bills. In addition to protecting insured consumers from balance billing, the NSA protects uninsured (or self-pay) individuals from many unexpectedly high medical bills. Specifically, effective January 1, 2022, a provider must furnish a self-pay patient with notice and a good faith estimate (“GFE”) of the cost of care prior to all scheduled services. This includes, among other things, a GFE of the cost of office visits, therapies, diagnostic tests, infusions, surgeries and any services reasonably expected to be provided in conjunction with such scheduled services. On December 21, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued guidance on the Good Faith Estimate and the Patient-Provider Dispute Resolution (“PPDR”) process for people without insurance or who plan to pay the costs themselves.
Continue Reading Q&A: The No Surprises Act’s Protections for Uninsured (or Self-Pay) Individuals